Research Publications Affiliated with Luxembourg: A Data-Driven Analysis

1 Introduction

This report presents a comprehensive analysis of Luxembourg’s research publication landscape using data extracted from OpenAlex, an open-access scholarly metadata platform. OpenAlex serves as a freely accessible alternative to proprietary academic databases, providing structured information about publications, authors, institutional affiliations, and research collaborations across all academic disciplines.

The data collection methodology focuses on identifying all scholarly works with Luxembourg institutional affiliations recorded in OpenAlex over the past decade. This approach captures both research led by Luxembourg-based scholars and international collaborative projects where Luxembourg institutions participate as co-authors. The temporal scope provides a current snapshot of the country’s scientific output and evolving research partnerships.

OpenAlex aggregates metadata from multiple sources including institutional repositories, publisher databases, and citation networks. While this multi-source approach enhances coverage comprehensiveness, data quality depends on the accuracy of source reporting and the platform’s ability to correctly identify and link Luxembourg-affiliated works. These methodological considerations should be kept in mind when interpreting the analytical findings presented throughout this report.

2 Data Structure and Document Types

The initial dataset encompasses all document types recorded in OpenAlex for Luxembourg-affiliated scholarly works during the study period. The following table displays the distribution of work types and the presence of Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), which serve as persistent identifiers linking to original publications:

Table 1: Distribution of types of work and missingness of DOI

Based on the substantial predominance of journal articles in the dataset and their central importance in academic research communication, this analysis restricts its focus to articles exclusively. This selection encompasses both publications with DOI identifiers and those without, ensuring comprehensive coverage of Luxembourg’s peer-reviewed research output.

The analytical framework employs a critical distinction based on first authorship status: whether the primary author maintains affiliation with a Luxembourg institution or represents an international collaboration where Luxembourg institutions participate as secondary contributors. This classification enables differentiation between research leadership and research participation within the national research ecosystem:

Table 2: Number of articles where the first author is LU-affiliated

3 Research Domain Analysis

The following visualization examines the temporal distribution of Luxembourg-affiliated research across major scientific domains. The data utilizes OpenAlex’s domain classification system, which categorizes research fields into broad disciplinary areas. The analysis tracks publication volumes over time while maintaining the distinction between Luxembourg-led research (first author affiliation) and collaborative research (non-first author participation):

OpenAlex employs a more granular classification system through subfields, which provides greater specificity than broad domains. Given that this taxonomy encompasses over 200 distinct subfields, this analysis focuses on the ten most frequently represented subfields in Luxembourg’s research output:

4 International Collaboration Patterns

The analysis extends to examining Luxembourg’s research collaboration patterns with international partners. The dataset contains information about co-author affiliations, enabling identification of the most frequent collaborating countries and regions. This section presents the geographical distribution of research partnerships, organized by publication year and distinguished by Luxembourg’s role as lead author versus collaborative partner.

The data processing groups countries into meaningful categories, including major individual nations, regional blocs, and an aggregated “Others” category for countries with lower collaboration frequencies. This approach provides clarity while maintaining analytical depth regarding Luxembourg’s primary research partnerships:

The table belows shows some citation statistics by year and domain:

Table 3: Citation statistics

As expected, citation patterns, regardless of discipline, publication year, or author affiliation, tend to follow a power-law distribution. Most research articles receive relatively few citations, as shown by the low median. In the health sciences, for LU-affiliated lead authors, only 25% of articles published in 2024 received at least 2 citations (as shown in the 75th percentile column in the table above), and just 1% reached 16 citations. However, citation counts accumulate over time, so it is more informative to consider older publications. For the same group, among articles published in 2019, 25% received at least 18 citations, and 1% reached 147 or more. The highest citation count observed for a single article in this group was 482.

Luxembourg has three official languages but English is the language of science, regardless of domain: